I recall some discussion on the list a while ago about having event "dates" (which are really just text labels) be updated automatically when their photos have their dates changed. Sounds to me like someone forgot to consider the case that you might not always want to adjust the date of all the photos in an event, and therefore need to split it...
It seems to me that things would be a lot less confusing if events were handled more like tags with long names, and we had a separate timeline view and/or hierarchy based solely on the photos' actual dates. Or would that be too much like F-Spot? :-) Andy. On 5 Jan 2012 08:45, "Dougie Nisbet" <[email protected]> wrote: > Not sure if this is a bug. > > I noticed that a few photos in my Event View for Mon 8 Sep 2003 were > misdated, and should be in 9 Aug 2003. So I selected them and adjusted the > date. As soon as I did this, *all* the photos in 8 Sep 2003 were moved to 9 > Aug 2003. > > To test, I did an Undo, then selected a single image and Adjusted the date > again. Once more, all the 103 photos in 8 Sep were recategorised into 9 Aug > 2003. > > There may be something else going on here, such as malformed exif data in > the images concerned. Interested to know if it's just me, and will do a few > more exhaustive tests as and when required. > > Dougie > > ______________________________**_________________ > Shotwell mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-**bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell<http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell> > _______________________________________________ Shotwell mailing list [email protected] http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell
