Hi

please always CC the list, they might be interested.

On Die, 2012-11-13 at 22:43 +0100, Moe Blue wrote:
> Hi Andreas,
> 
> thank you for your help.
> 
> > it's photo.db but you probably meant that.
> > 
> yep. sorry for the typos.
> 
> >> Most of my tags seem to be lost.
> > You should write them back to the photo (there's an option for
> that),
> > then they should survive such operations
> 
> if I apply your SQL trick this is not necessary anymore. is it?
Yes, you're right, that's not necessary. But then you could also, God
forbid, move to a different picture manager ;)

> Does the option to write metadata to photos also apply for
> transformations, flags and events or only for tags?
No just tags, and just on pictures that support tags (probably not on
RAW and videos)

> > some chances doing that. However you hopefully made a backup, so you
> can
> > try again if you feel confident enough.
> 
> I have a untouched copy of database and photos on my old PC.
> 
> Before I start with your workaround, two questions:
> 
> > - Upgrade shotwell in place to the version you want to use after the
> > move (just start the new version, let it do its work, maybe leave it
> > open a few minutes more and close it again)
> 
> First, on (old) fedora 17 I have 0.13.1, so I should upgrade 0.13.0 to
> 0.13.1 on the new ubuntu 12.10 machine using the yorba ppa, right?
Yes, versions must match - the DB is dependent on the shotwell version.
I don't think the distro packagers would modify the DB layout, therefore
matching the versions *should* be enough.

> Second, the write metadata to files is not needed for this step,
> right? Does it help, anyway?
No, won't help a thing

> Best
> Moe
cheers


> 
> 2012/11/13 Andreas Brauchli <[email protected]>
>         Hi Moe
>         
>         On Die, 2012-11-13 at 21:58 +0100, Moe Blue wrote:
>         > Hi there,
>         >
>         > I've moved my photos and shotwell to a new PC (fedora 17 to
>         ubuntu 12.10)
>         > and the RAW+JPEG are not paired anymore. On fedora 17, I
>         installed shotwell
>         > 0.13 from source. On ubuntu 12.10 I use the shotwell 0.13.1
>         from the
>         > official repositories.
>         >
>         > First, I moved my old shotwell database to
>         > /home/user/.local/share/shotwell/data/photos.db
>         > overwriting the (empty?) one.
>         
>         it's photo.db but you probably meant that.
>         
>         > On my old machine, photos were stored at
>         > /media/daten/fotos/
>         > now they are stored at
>         > /home/user/Bilder/
>         
>         
>         > Most of my tags seem to be lost.
>         
>         You should write them back to the photo (there's an option for
>         that),
>         then they should survive such operations
>         
>         > Is there a way to fix this? Or do I have to re-import
>         everything manually.
>         > I find, that moving it to the DCIM folder on my camera's
>         storage card while
>         > restoring the original name for the JPG makes it possible to
>         perform a
>         > clean new import of the photos.
>         
>         Moving storage locations is not a supported feature, so you
>         took quite
>         some chances doing that. However you hopefully made a backup,
>         so you can
>         try again if you feel confident enough.
>         What I would do is:
>         - Back up the photo db to a different location (otherwise you
>         get one
>         single shot at it.. if you like adrenaline ;))
>         - Upgrade shotwell in place to the version you want to use
>         after the
>         move (just start the new version, let it do its work, maybe
>         leave it
>         open a few minutes more and close it again)
>         - DO NOT START SHOTWELL ANYMORE NOW
>         - Connect to the db and fix the paths to their new locations
>         with an
>         appropriate sqlite query. Nothing scary if you know some sql
>         dialect -
>         otherwise you're screwed. A pretty good graphical tool to do
>         that is
>         sqliteman (query is still text though)
>         - Move the pictures to the new location - the you updated your
>         db with
>         - NOW START SHOTWELL and it won't even notice something's
>         different
>         I did that a few times some versions back and never had
>         problems.
>         If done right i'm sure it also works with the raw-pairing
>         (never used
>         that but there's usually no dark magic involved in open
>         software)
>         
>         no guarantees.. $(cat dead_kitten_speech)
>         
>         > Best
>         > Moe
>         Cheers and good luck
>         andreas
>         
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Moe Blue
> 


_______________________________________________
Shotwell mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell

Reply via email to