On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 9:43 AM, Sybren A. Stüvel <syb...@stuvel.eu> wrote:
> On Friday 19 February 2010 02:13:20 you wrote: > > Got down to 0.25 comparing *ALL* fields, and I suspect this is the bare > > minimum (at least with your timing application) and the rest is overhead. > > I'm using collation and everything is using indexes now, so it's quite > > fast, almost doesn't compare at all. > > > > Will see if there's anything more I can do. > > Excellent! Now to wait until it shows up in shr-testing ;-) > > PS: there is no need to CC me, I've subscribed to the shr-devel list. > > -- > Sybren A. Stüvel > syb...@stuvel.eu > http://stuvel.eu/ > I usually send to whoever I talk to, and cc the list, I find it more convinient (default in gmail's reply-all) and nicer, if you really want, I can stop when replying to you (if it breaks your rules or something). -- Tom.
_______________________________________________ Shr-devel mailing list Shr-devel@lists.shr-project.org http://lists.shr-project.org/mailman/listinfo/shr-devel
