Em 13-04-2010 14:25, Tom Hacohen escreveu:
> On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 3:53 PM, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra <r...@1407.org>wrote:
> 
>> Em 29-03-2010 13:50, Sybren A. Stüvel escreveu:
>>> On Monday 29 March 2010 01:43:37 Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote:
>>>> A typical phone user is perfectly capable to fix the stored number to
>>>> use international form if he intends to do so.
>>>
>>> My point is that a typical phone user shouldn't have to. The software
>> should
>>> support the user, not the other way around.
>>>
>>>> And for phone number to name match, nothing simpler: match from end, not
>>>> from start of number.
>>>
>>> So everybody that has a number ending in "112" will show up as
>> "emergency"?
>>> The same goes for many phone provider service numbers that are shorter
>> than
>>> regular telephone numbers.
>>
>> That wouldn't happen, because the number is *much*longer* than 112.
>>
> 
> Have you heard of 911?

911 != 112

> Furthermore, I ain't gonna write broken code that
> usually works.
> And btw, this is not perfect, what will you do with
> +972-3-1234567
> vs
> 03-1234567
> ?
> When you do things in a hackish way, you encounter idiotic issues :P

len(+972-3-1234567) > len(03-1234567)
0097231234567 > 031234567

I see no hackish way.

>>> I'm all in favour of KISS, but I think that usability is more important
>> than
>>> software design.
>>
>> One key item in usability is to do what users expect. Can you tell me of
>> a phone that acts as you defend?
>>
> 
> This can be solved in other manners, furthermore, I have never seen a phone
> that acts
> like I expect it to concerning number resolving.

Rui
_______________________________________________
Shr-devel mailing list
Shr-devel@lists.shr-project.org
http://lists.shr-project.org/mailman/listinfo/shr-devel

Reply via email to