Will have to discuss it with core, but cool :P

On 4/30/10, Tim Abell <[email protected]> wrote:
> brilliant, thanks Tom
>
> Tim Abell
>
> Tom Hacohen wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 1:38 AM, Tim Abell <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>  I got asked to cc it.
>>>
>>> <tim_abell> i'll cc the shr lists so people can object if i'm also too
>>> full
>>> of bier (not that i am, but people might think i am :-) )
>>> <Ainulindale> tim_abell: cc coreteam then
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Well, it's just annoying as we are all here anyway (sorry ainu)
>>
>>
>>> fixed upstream and making current upstream sounds great to me.
>>>
>>> would it be possible to also keep track of whether the fix has made it
>>> into
>>> shr-u?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> Actually, I'll just make "upstream" an "open" resolution, and instead of
>> fixed upstream, We'll just use the current
>> fixed/fixed-unstable although I was against keeping "garbage" in our trac,
>> I
>> see now that it may be important
>> to keep info about the bugs we currently suffer from.
>>
>


-- 
Tom.
_______________________________________________
Shr-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.shr-project.org/mailman/listinfo/shr-devel

Reply via email to