Hi,

Em 01-05-2010 08:05, Martin Jansa escreveu:
> Rui: can you please comment if you'll still maintain your omnewrotate
> svn repo http://code.google.com/p/omnewrotate/ and merge Tim's patches
> (maybe pass R/W access to Tim?).

For the time being I'm maintaing the google code repo for omnewrotate,
but I am definitely considering to use gitorious (and not git-hub) or
maybe even setup my own git repo.

Tim: I don't integrate *all* of your changes, as they remove the
possibility of having rotation always on WRT to suspend/resume cycles.

One who doesn't like/want that feature, can always define START="no" in
/etc/default/omnewrotate.conf and/or remove the resume.d and suspend.d
scripts.

> And there is patch in OE
> http://git.openembedded.org/cgit.cgi/openembedded/tree/recipes/omnewrotate/files/correct-sysfs-bl-path.patch
> it looks like replace for sysfs paths and max value which is in 2.6.32
> kernel with 2.6.29 equivalents. Would be nice if you can check which
> path is right in runtime, so we don't need to track another package,
> which needs adjustment with switch to 2.6.32 kernel in SHR, thanks!. 

That was already committed, but now it's a bit smarter as requested :)

Rui
_______________________________________________
Shr-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.shr-project.org/mailman/listinfo/shr-devel

Reply via email to