On Sat, May 01, 2010 at 12:00:37PM +0100, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Em 01-05-2010 08:05, Martin Jansa escreveu:
> > Rui: can you please comment if you'll still maintain your omnewrotate
> > svn repo http://code.google.com/p/omnewrotate/ and merge Tim's patches
> > (maybe pass R/W access to Tim?).
> 
> For the time being I'm maintaing the google code repo for omnewrotate,
> but I am definitely considering to use gitorious (and not git-hub) or
> maybe even setup my own git repo.
> 
> Tim: I don't integrate *all* of your changes, as they remove the
> possibility of having rotation always on WRT to suspend/resume cycles.
> 
> One who doesn't like/want that feature, can always define START="no" in
> /etc/default/omnewrotate.conf and/or remove the resume.d and suspend.d
> scripts.
> 
> > And there is patch in OE
> > http://git.openembedded.org/cgit.cgi/openembedded/tree/recipes/omnewrotate/files/correct-sysfs-bl-path.patch
> > it looks like replace for sysfs paths and max value which is in 2.6.32
> > kernel with 2.6.29 equivalents. Would be nice if you can check which
> > path is right in runtime, so we don't need to track another package,
> > which needs adjustment with switch to 2.6.32 kernel in SHR, thanks!. 
> 
> That was already committed, but now it's a bit smarter as requested :)

Thanks a lot!

0.5.8 version now available in shr-u feeds.

Regards,

-- 
uin:136542059                jid:[email protected]
Jansa Martin                 sip:[email protected] 
JaMa                         
_______________________________________________
Shr-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.shr-project.org/mailman/listinfo/shr-devel

Reply via email to