Flemming wrote "Gigabytes is created by many small bytes" Keep always this in mind, (even for laptop development) more resources means more energy, and less autonomy. SHR is the best distro for this point, don't ruin it! I am not a software engineer, just an experienced engineer with common sense (and a bad English writing ..) You all discuss about the technical capability and performance of dropbear and openssh. You are all right ... and all wrong! What is important ? It is the end user, like me, who just want a phone for daily use. With the actual technical configuration, I can connect to my FR to download map an music on the SD card (using konqueror and sftp), I can update my SHR, and even open tangoGPS or navit on my my PC screen (I think, you, software guy, call this -X :)). I don't need more. So use in SHR image the solution that uses less resources (even if it is only 10% less). If you need more advanced features, you know how to install a more complex software (you call it openssh isn't it ?)
Piratebab Klaus 'mrmoku' Kurzmann a écrit : > Hey all, > > just a short poll about dropbear / openssh. Up to now we are using dropbear > as > SSH server. It is supposed to have a smaller footprint than the fully fledged > openssh. On the other hand it lacks some features that openssh has (x- > forwarding and sftp for example). > > What is your valuable opinion about that? We would be inclined to do that > replacement... any strong opinion against that? > > Thanks > _______________________________________________ Shr-User mailing list [email protected] http://lists.shr-project.org/mailman/listinfo/shr-user
