On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 6:06 PM, Sebastian Krzyszkowiak <[email protected]
> wrote:

> On 7/15/09, Tom <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 5:01 PM, Sebastian Krzyszkowiak
> > <[email protected]
> >> wrote:
> >
> >> On 7/15/09, c_c <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > Hi,
> >> >
> >> > Tom-6 wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> I agree, I think we should think about e17 integration and not
> forking
> >> :)
> >> >>
> >> >   I agree too - only, a few of us will have to begin work since the
> e17
> >> team
> >> > is busy with e17 :-)
> >> >
> >> > Tom-6 wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> especially since this app is awesome! I'm more than sure that it'll
> be
> >> >> accepted as default as soon as you send it
> >> >>
> >> >   I think Illume will need a rewrite / code addition to add similar
> >> > functionality. Actually, since Illume uses evas directly, a native
> >> > implementation of the functionality provided by Launcher will be far
> >> better
> >> > done in Illume.
> >> >   I'm looking at illume's code - and intend starting hacking it from
> >> > next
> >> > week. Hopefully, I should be able to get something going by the month
> >> > end
> >> -
> >> > depending on what free time I manage to devote.
> >> >   Volunteers for coding are more than welcome and someone will need to
> >> > do
> >> > some artwork too. People willing to devote time can say so on this
> >> > list.
> >> > I'll contact them after I set up a repo on googlecode.
> >> >   Also can someone send me better icons for the missed calls / sms
> >> received?
> >> > I would prefer svg - so that I can get them sized correctly.
> >> >  Thanks
> >>
> >> Please consider using opimd interface to indicate missed calls and
> >> unread messages. It's already usable (pyphonelog uses opimd Calls
> >> domain for instance, and there are oeventsd rules for new calls and
> >> messages)
> >>
> >
> > dos1, I don't think he should use the opimd interface, as I don't think
> he
> > should implement those at all!
> >
> > c_c, You should provide dbus (or other?) api for setting/changing the
> > missed
> > calls/messages/etc (or even make it plugable?) as illume should not be
> > framework dependent.
> >
> > Tom.
> >
>
> Now it uses ogsmd, that's why i asked to change. And if Illume will
> accept external launchers, then you said nonsense, as it will be
> implemented in external launcher, not Illume itself ;)
>

The suggestion to use external launchers was suggested after my initial idea
proposal! :)
I suggested making the launcher the default and just supporting plugins and
external API.

Tom.
_______________________________________________
Shr-User mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.shr-project.org/mailman/listinfo/shr-user

Reply via email to