As long as they are easy to install after the fact and it's obvious when something isn't working because of a missing module, I'd be fine with removing all modules that aren't needed for core/basic functionality.
-Steven On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 2:17 PM, Tom<[email protected]> wrote: > Hey everyone, > We (many people) discussed on IRC about reducing SHR fat from the lite > image, we found many heavy and useless packages installed by default and of > course dropped them (a very obvious example: tcpdump). > After that, we decided to attack the kernel modules mess (as suggested in a > ticket in our trac iirc), I attached (and also linked to the wiki page) a > list of kernel modules installed in shr by default, > please tell us what you think (i.e which to remove). Play try to avoid > echoing (i.e writing I agree with X) as it'll just make our work harder :) > > I actually think a wiki page is most suitable for this kind of work, so I > also created a wiki page, please consider editing that instead of replying > here! > > wiki: http://wiki.shr-project.org/trac/wiki/Kernel%20Modules > > -- > Tom. > > _______________________________________________ > Shr-User mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.shr-project.org/mailman/listinfo/shr-user > > _______________________________________________ Shr-User mailing list [email protected] http://lists.shr-project.org/mailman/listinfo/shr-user
