On Sun, Aug 9, 2009 at 6:05 AM, Steven **
<[email protected]<montgoss%[email protected]>
> wrote:

> As long as they are easy to install after the fact and it's obvious
> when something isn't working because of a missing module, I'd be fine
> with removing all modules that aren't needed for core/basic
> functionality.
>
> -Steven
>
> On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 2:17 PM, Tom<[email protected]> wrote:
> > Hey everyone,
> > We (many people) discussed on IRC about reducing SHR fat from the lite
> > image, we found many heavy and useless packages installed by default and
> of
> > course dropped them (a very obvious example: tcpdump).
> > After that, we decided to attack the kernel modules mess (as suggested in
> a
> > ticket in our trac iirc), I attached (and also linked to the wiki page) a
> > list of kernel modules installed in shr by default,
> > please tell us what you think (i.e which to remove). Play try to avoid
> > echoing (i.e writing I agree with X) as it'll just make our work harder
> :)
> >
> > I actually think a wiki page is most suitable for this kind of work, so I
> > also created a wiki page, please consider editing that instead of
> replying
> > here!
> >
> > wiki: http://wiki.shr-project.org/trac/wiki/Kernel%20Modules
> >
> > --
> > Tom.
> >
> >

I disagree! The phone should be able to provide cool (though basic)
funcutunality like being able to read a usb stick!
If that's what you meant, (i.e keep those) that's where we are heading,
though I opened this wiki page to help us mark what's
important and what's not.



-- 
Tom.
_______________________________________________
Shr-User mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.shr-project.org/mailman/listinfo/shr-user

Reply via email to