On Thursday 12 November 2009 08:16:39 am Sebastian Spaeth wrote:
> 
> So has vala. Don't we have enough premature alpha quality on our
> Freerunners already so that we need to add more instability and moving
> bleeding-edge tech?

I'm not saying jump on the Go bandwagon yet, something like this could be 
given time to mature before even considering it, I just want to know what 
everyone thinks about it
> 
> PS. BTW, buildhost is currently compiling what we hope to release as the
> new shr-unstable right now.

Thinks for letting us know, lets hope it builds, I personally hope that #664 
is resolved in the new release 

-- 
"We must plan for freedom, and not only for security, if for no other reason 
than only freedom can make security more secure."  Karl Popper

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

_______________________________________________
Shr-User mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.shr-project.org/mailman/listinfo/shr-user

Reply via email to