On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 10:37 AM, Martin Jansa <[email protected]>wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 10:20:55AM +0100, Davide Scaini wrote: > > > This is less clear why, but I understand the message :) > > Thank you for your help, now I'm ready to build/test if you need some > help > > in, before publish in public feeds (I would like to help if possible, i > had > > great things from shr and i want to give some back). > > Thanks for this offer, maybe we should decide about some way to publish > git changes we're testing before pushing them to OE branch. > > I have usually some patch queue in my local branch, but I'm rebasing > that almost with every git pull.. so it's not easy to use/worth publishing. > > my offer: if you want maybe i can pull from your branch (or whatever you think you'll push to oe), build+test and give feedback (say 2/3 days) > > Thanks again > > d > > It will be clear (probably :)) from SRCPV migration thread on > openembedded-devel ML > > > http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg01607.html > > To say it as short as possible > those packages with +gitrNNNN-revision in package version, have usually > NNNN much higher in shr feeds than in your feeds (from reasons described > in that thread). So if you want to use only your feeds than you have to > force NNNN be as high as shr buildhost had when you last opkg updated or > flash image built by you (this way opkg will think that your versions > are the latest - never see higher NNNN in feeds). > > damnly complicated for me. I trust you :) > And shr buildhost cache is available here > http://build.shr-project.org/shr-unstable/cache/ > > Thanks! d > -- > uin:136542059 > jid:[email protected]<jid%[email protected]> > Jansa Martin > sip:[email protected]<sip%[email protected]> > JaMa >
_______________________________________________ Shr-User mailing list [email protected] http://lists.shr-project.org/mailman/listinfo/shr-user
