On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 8:29 PM, Joachim Ott <[email protected]>wrote:
> On 4 February 2010 18:20, Tom Hacohen <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 6:15 PM, Joachim Ott <[email protected]> > > wrote: > >> > >> On 3 February 2010 16:22, Thomas Zimmermann <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > Am Mittwoch 03 Februar 2010 16:05:12 schrieb Joachim Ott: > >> >> Very much wanted for fso config files. The last line in a file (e.g. > >> >> fsodeviced.conf) should be > >> >> > >> >> include ~/.config/fsodeviced.conf (or $HOME/.config/fsodeviced.conf) > >> >> > >> >> 1. No action is made when the config file does not exist. > >> >> > >> >> 2. A warning is written to *syslog* (not somewhere else) when a > >> >> section or a parameter doesn't exist (anymore) > >> >> > >> >> 3. Any parameter in the "local" conf overrides the value from the > >> >> "system" > >> >> conf. > >> >> > >> >> Benefits: > >> >> > >> >> - no need to modify the system config anymore, no questions from opkg > >> >> needed > >> >> > >> >> - no longer headaches after an opkg upgrade > >> >> > >> >> Downside: > >> >> > >> >> - it has to be implemented > >> >> > >> >> Any thoughts from you? > >> > > >> > It was implemented in a better way 4 days ago: > >> > > >> > > http://git.freesmartphone.org/?p=cornucopia.git;a=commit;h=509f3a582d34d312abbd2a1097bde85068d69be4 > >> > >> When $HOME/.foo.conf was read, will > >> /etc/freesmartphone/conf/<machine>/foo.conf be read also? The other > >> way round (first the system values, then the local values overriding > >> them) would make me happy already. Otherwise, how do I get aware of > >> new (or obsolete) sections or parameters? > >> _______________________________________________ > > > > I don't think it'll ever happen, as this is a terribly bead idea, system > > daemons should not rely on user configs. > > Well, I don't like the values for dim, idle_dim etc in the standard > fsodeviced.conf so I have to change them in the file, which is of > course overwritten with the next upgrade. When I try to change the > values with shr-settings, my changes are not written back. Even worse, > when I leave shr-settings and I start it over, the old values come up > again. Tho I'm always working as root on the FR, a normal user should > be able to have his personal values for this dim stuff. > That may be true, but you still shouldn't be able to control all of fsodeviced. Maybe there's a need for a way to control it per user, I don't know. -- Tom.
_______________________________________________ Shr-User mailing list [email protected] http://lists.shr-project.org/mailman/listinfo/shr-user
