On Fri, Feb 05, 2010 at 01:19:57PM +0200, Tom Hacohen wrote: > On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 11:43 AM, Vladimir Berezenko <[email protected]>wrote: > > > В Птн, 05/02/2010 в 10:33 +0200, Tom Hacohen пишет: > > > > > That may be true, but you still shouldn't be able to control all of > > > fsodeviced. Maybe there's a need for a way to control it per user, I > > > don't know. > > > > > > I'm also tired of fixing the configs which are strange enough. > > Everything might be done like in GDM configs. Just file > > in /etc/freesmartphone (don't think that it is good to be done on per > > user basis) which don't replace all the config options, but only those, > > which are mentioned there. > > > > -- > > WBR, Vladimir Berezenko > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > In general opkg should not replace your config files without asking you. If > it's not the case, please open a ticket in trac as this probably a > misconfiguration in the package creation recipe.
It was set for /etc/freesmartphone/*.conf file. I had it also for new /etc/freesmartphone/conf/device files, but mickey said that, it's not right place for user modifications and user modified configs should be placed /etc/freesmartphone or ~ etc. So I removed CONFFILES from fso recipes. (Also partialy because CONFFILES seems to ignore paths with wildcards, so all configs available with every fso daemon would need to be listed in recipe - which is pain as recipe would need updated list with every new device config). Which means that user has to check diff after fso upgrades, if there is something new which should be integrated to his modified config. So I removed CONFFILES from recipes. Regards, -- uin:136542059 jid:[email protected] Jansa Martin sip:[email protected] JaMa _______________________________________________ Shr-User mailing list [email protected] http://lists.shr-project.org/mailman/listinfo/shr-user
