On 2010-04-13, Kip Warner wrote: > Why would the burden be selectively on me? I was already ensured when I > purchased the device that it was ready for normal end users.
Oh come on. I can understand that you are annoyed that your FR is still not a functional phone. So am I. But don't come with that bullshit to *US*. We are not openmoko.com and if they failed to deliver you your promises go and sue them. We are SHR, a completely unpaid volunteer driven distribution that wants to make phone calls. Why do you want to put the burden of getting your contact synchronization working selectively on *us*? This is open source. Have an itch? You'll need to scratch it. Freeriding on the efforts of others is fine in open source, see. But don't come to *us* with guarantees made a hardware vendor that has since then retreated from the phone market. I repeat, we are not Openmoko.com and most of the active people have never worked for Openmoko. > That is why > I held off on the 1973 since it was for developers only. When the > FreeRunner came out and they made that clear, I spent around $400 on it, > and so did many others. Did they not spend some of their revenue on > developers? Apparently not, don't blame us for that. spaetz _______________________________________________ Shr-User mailing list [email protected] http://lists.shr-project.org/mailman/listinfo/shr-user
