On Tue, 2010-04-13 at 19:17 +0000, Cry wrote:
> The burden is on you because you want it.  Do you feel a sense of 
> entitlement?  Openmoko is gone from this space leaving the phone
> stack being improved by various folks acting on their own.  
> 
> Nobody around any more owes you anything.  If you feel so betrayed,
> why don't you sue Openmoko in small claims court?
> 
> At this point, it seems to me that you are just trolling.
> 
> Cry

Cry, your logic makes no sense at all. I asked a legitimate question and
you responded with irrelevant references to feelings of betrayal,
lawsuits, the judicial system, and lastly creatures living under
bridges. I was not pointing fingers at anyone. You've exceeded your
utility in answering this question, so you are not needed further with
my thread since others managed to answer it in a mature manner.

The "burden" should be on those who received compensation for providing
goods as advertised in the first place. I've never faulted volunteers of
tangential projects for their contributions.

OpenMoko, however, did not volunteer the device to me. They asked for
payment and received it, on the grounds that the device was ready for
the end user. This was how it was advertised and this was the impression
people were left with when they bought it.

-- 
Kip Warner -- Software Developer
President & CEO Kshatra Corp.
OpenPGP encrypted/signed mail preferred
http://www.thevertigo.com

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

_______________________________________________
Shr-User mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.shr-project.org/mailman/listinfo/shr-user

Reply via email to