Nick <[email protected]> writes:
> As FSO has changed so much, and this bug (GSM issues) seems like
> more the sort of "it's likely been fixed by a range of commits which
> interdepend on other things" sort of issue, I think cherry-picking
> fixes into the current shr-t can't result in a rock-solid phone, at
> least just yet.
I'm not sure; there is feedback here. Assuming SHR-T marches on and
more people have it on their phones, maybe the various upstreams will
feel incentivised to help with cherry-picking important fixes back to
the older codebase?
> I think as to general approach, you needn't worry about shr-t just
> being an irregular shr-u snapshot; the only reason it has become
> that recently is lack of manpower and will. With Tim marching
> triumphantly on, and others hopefully following his lead, we can
> definitely do better than that.
Well I'm looking forward to hearing in more detail what Tim has in mind.
Regards,
Neil
_______________________________________________
Shr-User mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.shr-project.org/mailman/listinfo/shr-user
