Ar 04/03/2005 am 00:23, ysgrifennodd Anthony Baxter: > On Friday 04 March 2005 00:20, Anthony Baxter wrote: > > Symmetric NATs are a pain. As the output says, you'll need to use an > > outbound proxy. A number of providers run these - for instance, FWD, divmod > > and stanaphone all have them. To use it with, for instance, FWD, set the > > outbound proxy setting to fwdnat.pulver.com:5082 > > I should also add that the other way to deal with symmetric NATs is to > enable UPnP on them. I'm not sure about the state of UPnP on Linux - > at some point, I plan to write a small UPnP server (in Python) which will > have hooks to call out to the relevant programs to actually do the port > forwarding...
So UPnP is the sanest of the available NAT-punching protocols? In which cases does Shtoom need to be able to accept incoming packets? Are these packets TCP or UDP or both? -- Dafydd _______________________________________________ Shtoom mailing list [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/shtoom
