On Sun, Nov 29, 2015 at 06:13:46PM -0000, John Levine wrote:
> It's not even privacy vs. ops support, it's privacy issues via some
> hints of sender's location vs. privacy issues via the recipient
> getting spammed, phished, and malware'd.

We're actually pretty good at fighting various kinds of malicious email
and while I know headers like Received do play a role there, I'm not yet
convinced that their role is so fundamental that removing them, or
removing essential parts of them, would see these (proactive and
reactive) defenses collapse.

And I do actually think there is a privacy issue here and that we
shouldn't dismiss that right away.

However, I agree with others that the proposed charter seems a little
premature and that, to quote Dave Crocker, we ought to have "public
discussion about the technical aspects of this policy tradeoff" first.

Martijn.

_______________________________________________
Shutup mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/shutup

Reply via email to