>I'm going to have some time starting in January to devote to this. >And I'm willing to put together a laundry list of issues-to-consider, >which will no doubt be incomplete, wrong, and poorly written. But it >would at least be a revision 0.1 try at enumerating the things we >could/should discuss.
I recently noticed RFC 5111 which describes an Exploratory Group, sort of half way between a WG and a RG. This seems like a good fit. R's, JOhn _______________________________________________ Shutup mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/shutup
