One other thing to remember is that if URL/URI is registered by
means of RFC, it needs to have protocol that is also documented
by RFC which rsync is not (its would be possible to get it into
informational RFC I suppose) and I have bad feeling that it is
not an IETF documented protocol would be bigger issue and without
it you may not be able to get SIDR drafts passed IESG or general
IETF last-call review (but I'm not sufficiently versed in IETF RFC
publication requirements to be certain how big of an issue it is).
On Wed, 28 Mar 2007, Sandy Murphy wrote:
Sandy: check "rsync:" as a registered URI type.
There is no "rsync:" URI scheme listed on the IANA registry:
http://www.iana.org/assignments/uri-schemes.html
For what it's worth, there also is no "rsync:" URN listed on the IANA
URN registry:
http://www.iana.org/assignments/urn-namespaces
--Sandy
_______________________________________________
Sidr mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
_______________________________________________
Sidr mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
