At 04:19 AM 29/03/2007, william(at)elan.net wrote:
One other thing to remember is that if URL/URI is registered by
means of RFC, it needs to have protocol that is also documented
by RFC which rsync is not
I was in a URI WG meeting some IETF's ago and I thought that this was
an historical and not a current constraint. I'm not sure what
transpired with this work, so perhaps the best way forward is to
establish what we can from the documentation. So if what you are
asserting is indeed the case then there should be documentation to
support this. Could you please point me to the IETF document where
the need you refer to above relating to a published RFC for a URI
type is clearly stated?
regards,
Geoff
_______________________________________________
Sidr mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
