Sandy, I reiterate my support for pursing the ROA validation I-D. We need the level of detail that Geoff has provided in this document, that goes beyond what is currently in the ROA I-D. They probably could be combined into one document, if the WG wants, but the info is essential.
I also want to express my support for the Repository Structure I-D. The info contained in this document is critical to completing the architecture description. The architecture references this doc. As for BOAs, I do like the notion. Some concern have been expressed that the construct may be too powerful. I think the WG should continue to discuss the topic and decide whether the notion can be made "safe" enough to satisfy the concerns that have been raised, or if we have to drop it. We can agree to adopt a document now, but that does not mean that we will eventually approve it, right? Steve _______________________________________________ Sidr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
