On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 02:05:16PM -0400, Sandy Murphy wrote: > It might be judged "apathy", though.
The SIDR work is a hyperfocused implementation of esoteric security issues. Admittedly those issues have broad impact on the Internet but they are arcane enough that even those who want to follow have a bit of a time doing so. :-) > whether the working group should adopt each topic as part of our work. > > The messages you should respond to are: > > > http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sidr/current/msg00401.html > (for draft-huston-sidr-bogons-01.txt - a new version has been > announced since, so the correct link is > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-huston-sidr-bogons-01.txt) I support this work. I'd also suggest a continuation of the discussion of the potential security issues related to these that Danny brought up last IETF. > http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sidr/current/msg00402.html > for draft-huston-sidr-repos-struct-01.txt I support this draft. I would, in particular, like to see further discussion of shared caches (helps the bootstrapping issue) as well as version numbers on manifests and other resources for purposes of determining what needs to be fetched. -- Jeff _______________________________________________ Sidr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
