I'd also question the purpose of TLS (ie, HTTPS vs HTTP) in this context. All the data are signed, there's no confidentiality or access control reuirement as far as I know, and the manifest design was specifically intended to remove the need for channel security. The draft doesn't contain any real analysis of what threats the protocol needs to defend against or why TLS is the right solution. _______________________________________________ sidr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
- Re: [sidr] request for wg adoption Robert Loomans
- Re: [sidr] request for wg adoption Roque Gagliano
- Re: [sidr] request for wg adoption David A. Cooper
- Re: [sidr] request for wg adoption Andy Newton
- Re: [sidr] request for wg adoption Randy Bush
- Re: [sidr] request for wg adoption Terry Manderson
- Re: [sidr] request for wg adoption Randy Bush
- Re: [sidr] request for wg adoption Andy Newton
- Re: [sidr] request for wg adoption Terry Manderson
- Re: [sidr] request for wg adopt... Rob Austein
- Re: [sidr] request for wg adoption Rob Austein
- Re: [sidr] request for wg adoption Robert Kisteleki
- Re: [sidr] request for wg adoption Terry Manderson
- Re: [sidr] request for wg adoption Terry Manderson
- Re: [sidr] request for wg adoption Rob Austein
- Re: [sidr] request for wg adopt... Terry Manderson
- Re: [sidr] request for wg adoption Terry Manderson
- Re: [sidr] request for wg adoption Andy Newton
- Re: [sidr] request for wg adoption Randy Bush
- [sidr] Request for WG adoption Geoff Huston
- Re: [sidr] Request for WG adoption Stephen Kent
