Re: [sidr] request for wg adoption

Mon, 20 Oct 2008 03:17:41 -0700 


On 10/18/08 2:22 AM, "Terry Manderson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>
> I'm torn on this. I see the simplicity side and really appreciates
> that, but I also see the benefits of heterogeneity.

Well, unless one method clearly has a trade-off the other method does not, I
see no reason for having two.  Do you see any?

>> So, when are we expecting a draft revision that addresses this issue
>> and the
>> others brought forward in Dublin?
>>
>
> When do you want it? prior to adoption as a WG item? or as a WG item
> revision?

I'd prefer a revision prior to adoption.  But failing that, an enumerated
list of changes agreed upon by the wg is good enough.

-andy

_______________________________________________
sidr mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr























					Reply via email to