Jeffrey Haas wrote:
Robert,
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 09:40:19AM -0600, Robert Kisteleki wrote:
After my (rushed) presentation yesterday I'd like to ask if there are
people in the WG who think that this idea is worth pursuing and should it
be a WG item?
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-kisteleki-sidr-rpsl-sig-00.txt
http://www3.ietf.org/proceedings/08nov/slides/sidr-3.pdf
I think this work is probably worth pursuing but I will echo a concern
raised at the session: This work is tightly bound to the stability of
the current object format drafts. You may wish to either consider
delaying your work until those have finished stabilizing or simply plan
on having your document go against a moving target.
The document that this one directly refers to is in WG last call, so I hope
it's going to settle down soon. But even then, this is a fair advice.
Also, please excuse a silly question since it's been a number of years
since I've been very RPSL savvy: How does this interact with RFC 2725,
if at all?
It's not the intention of this draft to modify authentication/authorization
behavior. Rather, it's an extension to the objects themselves.
Robert
-- Jeff
_______________________________________________
sidr mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
