I concur with Larry. Additionally, I agree with several of the participants who said this is good work. I don't believe good work should be discouraged just because of administrative square-peg/round-hole problems.
-andy On 11/18/08 11:23 AM, "Larry Blunk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I would support adoption. Would perhaps like to > see some consideration of hierarchical named sets > (i.e. ASXXXX:AS-CUSTOMERS). > > -Larry Blunk > > > Robert Kisteleki wrote: >> Hi, >> >> After my (rushed) presentation yesterday I'd like to ask if there are >> people in the WG who think that this idea is worth pursuing and should >> it be a WG item? >> >> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-kisteleki-sidr-rpsl-sig-00.txt >> http://www3.ietf.org/proceedings/08nov/slides/sidr-3.pdf >> >> Regards, >> Robert >> _______________________________________________ >> sidr mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr > > _______________________________________________ > sidr mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr > _______________________________________________ sidr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
