In re-reading the WG Charter, I note:
Lead-in paragraph:
"A related question concerns the level of trust than can be ascribed
to attributes of a route object in terms of their authenticity"
Scope:
"Document the use of certification objects within this secure routing
architecture"
It doesn't prescribe what a certification object is exactly, and with
the above in mind I believe the SIDR working group is a suitable place
for this work, and I think the WG should adopt this draft as a
workgroup item and I am willing to read and review.
Thanks
Terry
On 19/11/2008, at 7:12 AM, Geoff Huston wrote:
WG co-Chair hat ON
Thanks for this request Robert.
I'd like to put the question to the WG to adopt this draft as a WG
document.
Please send in your comments to the WG by Friday November 28th on
this.
I'll note the comments already posted on this thread so there is no
need to post again if you've already voiced your views on this
question.
thanks,
Geoff
On 19/11/2008, at 2:40 AM, Robert Kisteleki wrote:
Hi,
After my (rushed) presentation yesterday I'd like to ask if there
are people in the WG who think that this idea is worth pursuing and
should it be a WG item?
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-kisteleki-sidr-rpsl-sig-00.txt
http://www3.ietf.org/proceedings/08nov/slides/sidr-3.pdf
Regards,
Robert
_______________________________________________
sidr mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
_______________________________________________
sidr mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
_______________________________________________
sidr mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
