On 26/11/2008, at 8:12 AM, Sandra Murphy wrote:
On Wed, 12 Nov 2008, Geoff Huston wrote:
WG Co-Chair hat _OFF_
Sandy,
The authors of these two drafts now believe that all SIDR WG
comments have been integrated into these documents, and there are
no further outstanding comments to be addressed.
Accordingly, we would like to request that you conduct a WG Last
Call for these documents in order to ensure that the WG is now
comfortable with these documents and all comments have been made,
and to assess whether the WG is now ready to move these two
documents to the IESG for IESG review.
It is clear from the ensuing discussion that we are not close enough
to consensus in this matter to conduct a last call.
We do need to work out the issues being raised before we can
reasonably conduct a last call.
--Sandy
WG Co-Chair hat OFF
Thanks for your response Sandy.
To the extent that this request for a WGLC on these documents has
provoked reading of these drafts and discussion of the issues in the
WG, this has been a very useful exercise so far. I trust that the
deferral of this call is not seen as an excuse by interested folk to
defer the WG discussion as well, as the debate so far has, I think,
managed to expose some substantive issues relating to the semantics of
these objects that I feel remain as yet unresolved in terms of
achieving consensus, rough or otherwise.
regards,
Geoff
_______________________________________________
sidr mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
