[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> if indeed there is agreement on one and only one RPKI, then
> one of the primary advantages of using the IP protocols will
> be lost.
>
> there is -zero- requirement for full, continious interconnectivity
> in the base IP protocol. creation of a mandate for a single, one
> and only RPKI, forces folks into an always on, always connected
> mode ... and i am not sure how well this presumption will work
> for things like mannet/monnet networking.
it's even worse than that. an rpki based on rfc 3779 extensions to
x.509 does not even work with the martian/venusian network which uses
campai routing with non-contiguous netmasks as desribed in
Paul Tsuchiya*, "Efficient and Flexible Hierarchical Address
Assignment," Proceedings INET 92, Kobe Japan, June 1992 [0]
and rfc 1219.
randy
--
[0] - embarrassingly, the isoc seems unable to keep all papers presented
at its conferences online.
_______________________________________________
sidr mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
