People seem to be confusing one specification with one trust anchor.
And also not noting that the ability of a relying party to choose a trust anchor is a big get-out-of-jail-free card for those who are allergic to the idea of one root. NOT that I'm recommending using that card.
--Sandy On Fri, 28 Nov 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
if indeed there is agreement on one and only one RPKI, then one of the primary advantages of using the IP protocols will be lost. there is -zero- requirement for full, continious interconnectivity in the base IP protocol. creation of a mandate for a single, one and only RPKI, forces folks into an always on, always connected mode ... and i am not sure how well this presumption will work for things like mannet/monnet networking. --bill _______________________________________________ sidr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
_______________________________________________ sidr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
