[No hat]
Hi,
I have been avoiding raising any issues on the res-cert draft for
political reasons, however I believe the draft is flawed in a non-
political way in that section 6.3 makes reference to IANA acting in
some capacity as a trust anchor yet the IANA Considerations section
states:
"[Note to IANA, to be removed prior to publication: there are no IANA
considerations stated in this document.]"
Either IANA is acting in some capacity as a trust anchor and as a
result there ARE IANA considerations
- OR -
IANA is not acting in in some capacity as a trust anchor in which case
the absence of IANA considerations is appropriate, but section 6.3
needs to be revised to make explicit that IANA is NOT involved in the
RPKI trust hierarchy.
You can't have both.
Hopefully this comment will not trigger political sensitivities
regarding IANA's role in the RPKI.
Back under my rock.
Regards,
-drc
_______________________________________________
sidr mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
