Based on the discussion in Stockholm, this seems like the right way
forward on algorithms.
I support adoption andam willing to review the draft.
- Matt Lepinski
Sandra Murphy wrote:
I am opening a two week call for comments on this request for working
group adoption of draft-huston-sidr-rpki-algs-00.txt.
The draft is available at
http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-huston-sidr-rpki-algs-00.txt.
As usual, the rules are that silence does not indicate assent, so
please actively reply.
If you support adoption of this draft as a working group item, please
also indicate whether you will be able to work on the draft
(contribute or review).
The call for adoption will end Friday, Aug 14, 2009.
This is a call for adoption only, so comments on the contents are not
necessary or needed.
--Sandy
On Fri, 31 Jul 2009, Geoff Huston wrote:
Hi Sandy,
With my WG co-chair hat off I would like to request WG adoption of
the draft draft-huston-sidr-rpki-algs-00.txt.
I believe that this document addresses WG concerns regarding how to
specify algorithms and key sizes in the RPKI profile in a manner that
does not over burden the CP nor require a re-issue of the certificate
profile specification as and when changes to the algorithms and key
sizes are considered prudent for the RPKI, as discussed in the WG
meeting this week.
thanks,
Geoff
_______________________________________________
sidr mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
_______________________________________________
sidr mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
_______________________________________________
sidr mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
