On 28/10/2009, at 11:53 AM, Randy Bush wrote:
i object to last call on this. there is a conflicting draft, and
one
not by a wg co-chair.
The conflicting draft has an outstanding IPR claim, which has not
been
discussed or addressed by the authors (which includes yourself Randy)
this is just part of normal life in the ietf. you might wait to learn
what ipr is claimed before lynching anyone.
I am not lynching anyone. Sam Weiler mailed the list last week on this
issue and I haven't seen a reply.
Don't you think its relevant? I think its relevant to WG adoption.
The draft has only just been proposed for adoption.
so?
It seems a little odd to promote a 'conflicting draft' as a WGLC
blocker when it hasn't even adopted as a WG item.
Can you explain what aspect of process prevents a WG co-chair from
authorship of documents in the WG?
the particular wg co-chair is a co-author on both drafts.
Wrong. go re-read the authors section of 03. The same edit which added
you as an author removed Geoff.
but you might
find <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sidr/current/msg01073.html>
somewhat relevant.
randy
I don't see anything relevant there. Its your own personal opinion,
and its on the record.
Shame on you Randy, for hijacking WG process for a personal agenda.
-George
_______________________________________________
sidr mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
