George and all,
On Oct 27, 2009, at 7:46 PM, George Michaelson wrote:
I wish to request you as as working group chair to conduct a Working
Group Last call on the following documents of which I am a co-author:
...
draft-ietf-sidr-roa-validation-03.txt
This draft says that its intended status is Informational. Does that
correctly represent what you think should happen with this document?
I.e., that it be published as an RFC but not as any kind of a
standard? (See also the RFC 2026 definition of "Informational".)
If so that would seem to suggest that the apparent conflict with draft-
pmohapat-sidr-pfx-validate-03.txt is moot, since an Informative
document, strictly speaking, can't conflict with a Standards Track
document.
Thanks,
--John
_______________________________________________
sidr mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
