>> naming of actors in this document still assumes that ISPs are the >> children. children might be RIRs (parent IANA), or end sites (parent >> ISPs or owning non-end user sites (e.g. business subsidiaries or govt >> structures)). > > I believe section 1.1 entirely addresses this point. The definition > of IR does not preclude service providers, nor does the definition of > ISP preclude either regional internet registries or end sites. > Summarised, they are: > > IR : an entity undertaking the role of resource issuer. > ISP : an entity undertaking the role of resource recipient who is the > subject of a Resource Certificate.
dear apnic mafia, these are well-known terms. please leave the goalposts in place. randy _______________________________________________ sidr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
