On Thu, 29 Oct 2009, Byron Ellacott wrote:
Randy,
On 28/10/2009, at 11:30 AM, Randy Bush wrote:
naming of actors in this document still assumes that ISPs are the
children. children might be RIRs (parent IANA), or end sites (parent
ISPs or owning non-end user sites (e.g. business subsidiaries or govt
structures)).
I believe section 1.1 entirely addresses this point. The definition of IR
does not preclude service providers, nor does the definition of ISP preclude
either regional internet registries or end sites. Summarised, they are:
IR : an entity undertaking the role of resource issuer.
ISP : an entity undertaking the role of resource recipient who is the subject
of a Resource Certificate.
Under this definition of ISP, would an RIR that received resources from
IANA and received a resource certificate for those resources be an ISP?
If not, why not?
--Sandy
Byron
_____________________________________________________________________
Byron Ellacott email: [email protected]
Technical Area Manager, APNIC sip: [email protected]
http://www.apnic.net phone: +61 7 3858 3100
_______________________________________________
sidr mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
