>> i am confused. i do not understand the relationship of a parent going >> out of business (irrespective of reason) with the time for an rpki >> instance to meet a new cp. >> >> seems to me thatm if my parent goes out of business, the scramble is to >> build the peerings with the parent(s) to which my grandparent swings the >> resources from which my resources are drawn. > > Randy, as I read John's note, when he says "RPKI service provider" he > means the CertsRUs business which the ISP has outsourced all its cert > handling activity to. > > It sounds to me like you were reading that as an upstream ISP.
oops! sorreeee. but, in that case, is not the largest part of the problem still getting the grandparent(s) to swing the covering resource set(s) to new parent(s)? is not the cp-compliance issue but one very small part of of the criteria on which i and my grandparent(s) choose new parent(s)? randy _______________________________________________ sidr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
