> My point is that 1 month is a very short time to implement potentially > significant operational changes from an updated CP, so unless there's > a reason for such a short time frame I'd recommend something longer.
but, in the real world, is cp-compliance a major criterion on which i will move to/from a rpki provider? i suspect it will be down in the weeds, and reliability/reputation, price, ease of operation, ... will predominate. otoh, i can see that an rpki-provider might want longer than a month to implement a new set of ops requirements. but does not the current ietf process provide years? randy _______________________________________________ sidr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
