> Randy, could you confirm that you would like to see this adopted by > the working group without respect to the status of the other document?
i confirm that we submitted draft-ymbk-rpki-rtr-protocol as a wg document irrespective of the status of draft-pmohapat-sidr-pfx-validate (which should be out in -07 shortly). i merely meant to note that there was a normative reference to it from draft-pmohapat-sidr-pfx-validate, and hence draft-ymbk-rpki-rtr-protocol was forced to come out of the closet of running code. randy _______________________________________________ sidr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
