I have said that it was the consensus even before sidr was officially a wg that proxy aggregation would not be part of our work. And I pointed to the email archive for that discussion.

You have said that you do not believe that it is possible at this point, so I don't think that you are unhappy with that statement.

So I am confused as to what further statement I could make that would help at this point.

Can you point me to where you still see a problem?

--Sandy

On Wed, 28 Apr 2010, Geoff Huston wrote:

three weeks ago I asked:


It seems to me that the essential requirements for securing proxy aggregation 
are missing at this stage, which makes it somewhat difficult for SIDR to work 
on mechanisms without some re-spinning of the SIDR WG Charter (or some other 
WG) that would permit the preliminary work on security requirements relating to 
proxy aggregation to come first.

So my question to the WG Co-chairs is: is work on securing  Proxy Aggregation 
within the current SIDR charter? If so, on what basis?

I would hope that by now the WGchairs have had sufficient time to consider this 
question, so I'd like to ask once more: Is work on securing  Proxy Aggregation 
within the current SIDR Charter? If so, on what basis?


regards,

Geoff


_______________________________________________
sidr mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr

Reply via email to