On 07/07/2010, at 12:29 AM, Rob Austein wrote: > At Tue, 6 Jul 2010 06:45:17 -0400 (Eastern Daylight Time), Sandra Murphy > wrote: >> >> Anyone who has a topic or draft to discuss, please send a message to the >> list or to both chairs. > > I would also like to see some discussion of the simplified trust > anchor proposal.
What appears to me missing in this second model, aside from the comments provided earlier by Steve Kent, is the singalling to relying parties as to the suggested refresh interval for the RTA. IN the ETA/RTA model the CRLDP provides a time interval that can be used by RPs to configure their next refresh of the local RTA. In this model what is the suggested refresh interval? Does one explicitly use short validity times on the RTA (this would be strange/ possibly bad) or does one leave it to the RP to just guess (again this seems strange/ possibly bad). Geoff _______________________________________________ sidr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
