On 07/07/2010, at 10:40 AM, Geoff Huston wrote: > > On 07/07/2010, at 12:29 AM, Rob Austein wrote: > >> At Tue, 6 Jul 2010 06:45:17 -0400 (Eastern Daylight Time), Sandra Murphy >> wrote: >>> >>> Anyone who has a topic or draft to discuss, please send a message to the >>> list or to both chairs. >> >> I would also like to see some discussion of the simplified trust >> anchor proposal. > > What appears to me missing in this second model, aside from the comments > provided earlier by Steve Kent, is the singalling to relying parties as to > the suggested refresh interval for the RTA. IN the ETA/RTA model the CRLDP > provides a time interval that can be used by RPs to configure their next > refresh of the local RTA. In this model what is the suggested refresh > interval? Does one explicitly use short validity times on the RTA (this would > be strange/ possibly bad) or does one leave it to the RP to just guess (again > this seems strange/ possibly bad). >
sorry - thats the CRL itself, not the CRLDP Geoff _______________________________________________ sidr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
