On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 06:49:16PM +0200, Randy Bush wrote:
> > The use-case I have in mind is that a given provider may have a number of
> > cache servers deployed within their network.  A given router may wish to
> > have a session with two servers for redundancy purposes.
> 
> do not do it

It seems odd for you of all people, Randy, to want a feature that can so
severely impact traffic to have a single point of failure.  Thanks for
clearing things up though. 

I'm interested in the opinion of the rest of the WG on this operational
matter.

-- Jeff
_______________________________________________
sidr mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr

Reply via email to