At Wed, 4 Aug 2010 17:44:24 +0000, Jeffrey Haas wrote: > > My concern is that if a cache is out of step with the policy server > that is used to populate that cache.
This description makes no sense in the context of the current protocol and implementations. You've introduced an independent element between the RPKI and the rpki-router protocol server (your "policy server"), then postulated a failure of that element. How you handle failures in elements you introduce would be between you and your rabbi. :) _______________________________________________ sidr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
