Hi, I started sending separate replies, but I am loosing track and spamming the list in the process.
I agree with George's list, so let me just quote that: > Call for WGLC, I support: > > draft-ietf-sidr-roa-format One very minor nit: I think it would be desirable to have a normative naming scheme similar to the one used for manifests as defined in the repos-struct document; using the extension .roa. Operationally, for validation, it would be useful to have at least the file extension defined to prevent having to try and parse objects retrieved to figure out what they are. But.. I don't want to block this one going forward if others disagree with this. A large if parses, else if parses, else if parses etc block in the code is ugly but it can be done. > draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-rtr > draft-ietf-sidr-keyroll > draft-ietf-sidr-res-certs > draft-ietf-sidr-repos-struct > draft-ietf-sidr-rescerts-provisioning > draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-algs > draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-manifests > draft-ietf-sidr-roa-validation > draft-ietf-sidr-signed-object > draft-ietf-sidr-ta > draft-ietf-sidr-arch > > Call for WG adoption, I support: > > draft-rgaglian-sidr-algorithm-agility > draft-ymbk-rpki-origin-ops > Cheers Tim _______________________________________________ sidr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
