At 9:29 PM -0500 12/2/10, Sandra Murphy wrote:
Andrew suggests that the new naming schemes should be added to the
repos-struct draft.
Tim's message implies that the naming scheme would be added to the
roa-format draft (by extension, to whatever draft creates a new
repository structure element, like the ghostbusters draft).
I'd like wg consideration as to which would be best, both now and
going forward.
--Sandy
I support adding .roa; I didn't realize it was not there already.
I think we can wait for GB, because it is a new doc, not yet final
(it was just adopted by the WG). We will need to have each new RPKI
signed object specify it's file extension for the future, so why now
start with the GB doc, when it is approved.
Steve
_______________________________________________
sidr mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
