----- Original Message ----- From: "Joel M. Halpern" <[email protected]> To: "Randy Bush" <[email protected]> Cc: <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2011 12:25 AM
> I think that would help, and it is good enough for me. > Thank you, > Joel > > On 3/1/2011 6:07 PM, Randy Bush wrote: > > something like > > > > A BGPsec design MUST allow the receiver of an announcement to > > detect that one or more ASes on the AS-Path is attempting to > > lure the receiver into sending traffic in a way that an > > announcer is not entitled to receive. > > Worded like this, with the emphasis on the consequences, would seem to include such things as inserting spurious communities, as opposed to just modifying the AS-Path in an unacceptable way. Is that the intention? It is quite a shift from the focus of 10 days ago, which I read as solely securing the AS-Path, as opposed to anything else that might be in the advertisement. Tom Petch > > ? > > > > randy > > > _______________________________________________ > sidr mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr _______________________________________________ sidr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
